Sibylle Springer

Sibylle Springer (geb. 1975, Münster, BRD) ist Malerin. Ihre großen Formate fertigt sie zumeist in Acryl auf Leinwand. Bekannt geworden ist sie mit ihren New Yorker Bildserien, die verregnete Straßenszenen und Graffiti in U-Bahntunneln zeigen. Auf ihren Leinwänden lässt sie die Motive implodieren. Zunächst überträgt sie die Szenen, dann legt sie Schicht für Schicht lasierende Acrylfarbschichten darüber. Die Gegenständlichkeit vergeht in gleißenden impressionistisch anmutenden Farbschimmern. Springer nimmt hier den Effekt des Regens und der Geschwindigkeit der U-Bahnen auf. Was bleibt sind Nachbilder – Reste von Erinnerungen an die äußere Wirklichkeit. Aus den nahezu abstrakten Anordnungen ihrer Lichtpunkte lassen sich die Szenerien ansatzweise rekonstruieren. So erkennt man hier und da Bordsteinkanten, Ampeln, Autos und Passanten, die sich vielleicht zu einer vollständigen Straßenszene zusammensetzen lassen.

Als Sibylle Springer 2011 damit begann, sich mit Gewaltdarstellungen und Schockmomenten zu beschäftigen, verfuhr sie zunächst auf eine ähnliche Weise. Die Grundlage für ihre Arbeiten boten ab da alte und aktuelle Kunstwerke, die sich mit Darstellungen von Grausamkeiten befassen. Sie verwendete dabei sowohl Fotografien aktueller Künstler wie Cindy Sherman, als auch Bilder der klassischen Moderne – so etwa von Max Ernst. Oft bezog sie sich jedoch auf die Malerei des Barock. Springer übertrug dabei die Bilder in ihren ursprünglichen Formaten auf ihre Leinwände und bedeckte sie mit immer wieder neuen Farbschichten. Die Acrylfarben trug sie dabei in Punkten, Tusche in Schlieren auf. Die ursprünglichen Bildinhalte werden so überdeckt und verfremdet.

In Springers aktuellen Arbeiten stehen zwar nach wie vor Szenen von Folter und Mord, die sie in Gemälden der Renaissance, des Barock oder des Rokoko findet, im Vordergrund. Aber auch das ambivalente Verhältnis zwischen Sexualität, Lust und Gewalt kommt immer öfter vor. Wiederholt findet man in diesen Bildern Verschiebungen, die auf filmischen Mitteln wie Schwenk und Zoom basieren. So wird aus einer dunklen, intimen und kleinformatigen Darstellung der Liebes- oder Vergewaltigungsszene zwischen Leda und dem Schwan des französischen Rokoko-Malers François Boucher bei Springer ein riesiges, farblich orgastisches Gemälde.

Springers neuere Bilder bestehen lediglich aus zwei streng aufeinander abgestimmten Farbtönen und wirken beinahe monochrom. Man sieht, als seien die Motive in die Leinwände gewebt, nur eine ganz feine Zeichnung.

Sibylle Springer hat in Bremen an der Hochschule für Künste in der Klasse von Katharina Grosse Karin Kneffel studiert. 2008 wurde sie mit dem renommierten Karl-Schmitt-Rotluff-Stipendium ausgezeichnet. Ihre Arbeiten befinden sich u.a. in den Sammlungen der Kunsthalle Bremen und der Kunsthalle Bremerhaven. Sie lebt als Künstlerin in Bremen und Berlin.

Works

Geheimnis der Dinge
time out
serial killers
Rachel Ruysch
gift
hell
Portraits
Wie die Tiere
Das Vergnügen
20 Blicke
Looming Signs | 19th Street (Rain)

Jens Asthoff

Bodies in View: The Paintings of Sibylle Springer

In: Sibylle Springer, gift, GAK, Bremen, 2017

 

As an artist, Sibylle Springer’s fascination is with the human body, or more precisely, with how the body is entangled with the gaze that is directed towards it and addressed to it. Her painting contemplates, unfolds and interprets this tense reciprocal relationship, which is fundamentally a self-relation, always already inscribed with an internal structure of refection, saturated in cultural history. Among other things, this means that despite the often direct and strongly afective impact of body-images, nothing about them is without preconditions and predeterminations. Innocent nakedness is just as much a construction as erotic sophistication. Whether artistic nude, pornography or biological objectivity, ethnologically other or historically estranged, ugly or beautiful, none of them are inherently ‘natural’, ‘obscene’, ‘objective’ or ‘revolting’.

In this much, Springer’s aesthetic project is at heart always a refection on the gaze: from this standpoint, it goes on to refect on painting, and its styles, visual traditions and subject matters. Consequently, Springer operates from the outset within a feld of representation(s). She does not, thus, create her own

particular portraits or nudes, like an Eric Fischl or a Lucian Freud, each of whom develop(ed) a characteristic gaze on the body. Instead, Springer re-presents her painting: in other words, she consistently refers to existing paintings and visual works. This certainly shares the discursive traits of “Appropriation Art”, in as much as it stands, per se, with one foot outside the contents of the image. It does so in order to turn the gaze towards the constitutive conditions of art in general and of the particular work in question, while absorbing this perspectival position into itself. A refexive move is made here: frst out of the image, then back into the image. Thus, it constructs a gaze on the gaze, achieved within the work itself. This step is also characteristic of Springer’s approach. However, as a restaging, Springer’s way of appropriation goes beyond this: her work appropriates in a thoroughly painterly way. Here, the original work is not merely contextualized and displayed with modifed signifers – as Richard Prince did with the Marlboro cowboy or Elaine Sturtevant with Duchamp’s readymades and Warhol’s paintings. In Springer’s work, an original painting is chosen after long and careful research, and is then transformed through painting. It is not merely ‘repeated’, but newly invented, so to speak, through her distinctive painting process: it is formally dissolved and reconstructed as something quite new.

Typical of this is her painting’s strong focus on surfaces: At times, the real subjects of her images are highly concealed. At frst glance, Springer’s works can often appear to be monochrome informel paintings, usually with pale or shining silver surfaces, but sometimes profoundly dark. For the viewer, the reworked subject matter only slowly coheres into a whole. For the most part, it demands concentrated, conscious viewing to bring the represented subject back ‘into focus’. In this way, Springer deliberately produces a challenge for the eye, both requiring and addressing a certain voyeurism, inherent to the pictorial in general, but also to the aspect of ‘exhibiting’. In terms of the human body, more specifc themes emerge: the erotic, for example, but also the voyeuristic curiosity in cruelty, violence and horror. The painting of Cecily Brown ofers a broadly comparable game, a puzzle-play with the voyeuristic gaze and desire’s concealment on the visual surface of the painting. Brown paints scenes taken from pornographic images: her fesh-coloured, Fauvist gestures simultaneously revealing and concealing the dramatic nude. But while Brown works with gesture in quasi-disruptive fashion, Springer opens up (and hides) her subjects – which also have broader cultural-historical scope – on surfaces made from a homogeneous range of colours.

Play with the voyeuristic gaze is already a feature of almost all the works Springer makes reference to. One direct example is La Gimblette (ou la femme qui pisse) (2016), a large-format adaptation of a

motif from the eponymous pair of works by French Rococo painter Francois Boucher (1703–1770). Two scenes are juxtaposed in Boucher’s small oval paintings of 1742: an innocent, playful scene in which an elegant woman trains a ‘docile dog’ (the painting’s subtitle) with a biscuit, and a second image, coarse and drastic, with the same woman lifting her skirts to urinate into a bowl she holds beneath her. In the background, barely visible, a curious spectator gazes through a window at the events of the image. Springer’s painting focuses on the latter motif. Her La Gimblette is a scene from bawdy salon painting, encompassing its particular thematic play: the tension between showing and hiding, taboo and its overcoming which Springer turns into a quite specifc experience of seeing. First of all she converts the original small scene into a much larger format of 210 Å~ 170 cm, turning Boucher’s fgure from a miniature to a lifesize fgure. Even more decisive is how she almost entirely conceals the representation, dissolving it into a broken monochrome fatness. At frst glance, the picture appears to have been immersed in silver-grey: it is irregular and fickering, but nonetheless presents a fat and coherent pictorial space, streaked in places with cloudy patches of colour, pale pink and dark grey, and more sparingly violet and green. Springer painted the subject so that it almost – but not quite – disappears. So for example, the foral frills of the lavish Rococo dress are not rendered with the original’s clear palette, but in weakly contrasting tones of pale silver grey. At frst, the image seems non representational, an amorphous fickering and glimmering, an efect, incidentally, quite capable of firting with the Rococo elegance of the original. But precisely because it withdraws from the gaze, the subject matter appeals all the more strongly to the curious, searching gaze. Initially confronted with abstraction, this gaze perhaps at frst makes out a foot, then a window frame. It goes on, becoming gradually more precise, to unveil the entire intimate scene, and suddenly fnding oneself in a voyeuristic perspective. Thus, Springer’s painting stages its own seduction of looking.

This is what Springer’s intensifcation of older paintings is all about: creating ambivalences and then visually navigating within them. The exhibition gift presented a comprehensive collection of images which clearly reveal the extent of her knowledge of pictures – this historical, thematic and generic range is implicitly contained in both her research and her work: a wall installation, untitled since Springer does not regard it as an autonomous work (she speaks of ‘the wall of my studio’) is a lively illustration of the visual space of refection in which her work is created and which serves as its context. In fact, the compilation collected in 2016 and 2017 – the exhibition presented postcards, newspaper clippings, found illustrations, printed pictures, etc. – is a consistent element of her daily working life. It has been transferred to the concluding area of the exhibition space, arranged into a kind of analogue cloud: 500 or more of these small-format images formed a dense structure here, at least 4 meters wide and as high as the ceiling. Springer said that since this working material, so important to her, has been in the exhibition and thus unavailable, a new set of pinboards has grown in her studio. Her painting is clearly based on a lively refection about those images.

The collection exhibited here features famous art-historical subjects, among them Goya’s Nude Maja (1795–1800), Parmigianino’s Self-Portrait in a Convex Mirror (1523) and the highly erotic subject, so often depicted, of Leda and the Swan, as well as little-known pictures. Advertising photography is also included, as well as traditional Japanese and other erotica, Renaissance portraits, comics, and motifs from the work of Robert Mapplethorpe, all mixed in with abstruse, obscene or magnifcently silly material found online. Conversely, we also see another kind of body-image, unsettling in a diferent way, for example old woodcuts showing torture scenes, carrying strange echoes of images of contemporary S&M practices. All of this is present in reproductions of photographs, paintings and prints. With fascinating variety, the collection encompasses images and stagings of the body, which emerged in diverse media and several centuries. Springer has organized this arrangement associatively, rather than chronologically or by style. In this way, surprising visual bridges often open up among the body-images, crossing epochs and styles, for example when the reproduction of Boucher’s La femme qui pisse is surrounded by extremely heterogeneous urination images. In this way, the entire structure

functions associatively – one jumps from image to image, creating connections. It is possible to genuinely lose oneself in the breadth of the spectrum, and certainly to have fun. Above all, one directly experiences the visual curiosity thematised by Springer’s painting.

The gaze and voyeuristic curiosity also play key roles in the large-format painting Dschungel (Jungle, 2017). The picture at frst seems to be a silver-coloured and (depending on the light) refective surface which seems to bounce of the gaze. Even at this point the picture’s enormous wealth of detail is visible, but at frst glance, its fguration is concealed by its shimmering, homogenous colours and emphatically fat application of paint, insomuch that represented fgures and events can barely be made out. Only gradually does a constellation of fgures emerge from this abstract set of elements: in a forest clearing, we see a woman on a swing, which a man on the right-hand side of the picture keeps in motion with a rope. Less apparent is a man recumbent in the bushes to the left of the picture. This is an adaptation of The Swing (1767–1768), a major work by Jean-Honor. Fragonard (1732–1806), Boucher’s (younger) contemporary and without question a central fgure in Rococo painting. This light, vivacious scene overtly plays with an eroticism of the gaze. It is not simply that the couple who do the swinging seem to have an amorous relationship, or that the natural setting, remote from society, serves as a ‘locus amoenus’, liberating the soul and the senses. In addition to this, the man in the bushes – it is unclear if he is a friend or a hidden observer – is integrated into the structure of gazes. Moreover, he is a voyeur: when he looks at the lady on the swing, who at the apex of her trajectory is even at the point of losing a shoe, he can see directly under her elaborate crinoline skirts.

As well as Fragonard’s light and airy style, especially present in his representations of nature, this art- historically relevant scene is above all of interest to Springer because of its visual architecture of desire. As a painting, Springer’s work adapts this in a particularly ingenious way: directly on the surface of the painting, the complexity, and even the voluptuousness, of the foral motif merges with its disappearance. Concealment and revelation all but converge. In this way, conscious vision is triggered as a literal ‘sharpening’ of the viewer’s gaze, linking the moment of voyeurism to the picture, which also thematises it.

In these genuine painterly interventions and interpretations, Springer addresses a theme inherent to the reference images she has chosen: the gaze upon the body. The small portrait Der Blick (The Gaze, 2015), to name another example, brings this to bear in a direct and surprisingly efective way. In terms of painting, Springer here takes a diferent approach than in the works described above, allowing the image’s subject to unfold out of the dark, thus binding the viewer’s gaze into the opacity. The work, painted in black with deep-blue nuances, shows a young man – or perhaps a young woman: the - uncertainty begins here – appearing to look at the viewer from out of nothingness. Here, Springer is adapting a portrait by the late-Classical French painter Pierre Paul Prud’hon (1758–1823). Her painterly interpretation reproduces the original in slightly cropped form, zooming in on the face somewhat, thus creating greater and surely more suggestive proximity. But at the same time, the picture is plunged into darkness to such a degree that in looking, the viewer’s gaze has, so to speak, to feel its way through a difuse, view-resisting layer. Having done this, it has the ambivalent sensation that the gaze of the subject, male or female, has been upon them all the time. Looking slightly sidewards, the collar pulled high, the hair combed back from the brow, the dark eyes rest coolly on the viewer. So who is the voyeur here, and who is observing whom? This is a picture which lures its viewer into a simple but artful structure of gazes, entangling him / her there. A picture which creates the sudden strange feeling that one is oneself being observed.

Jens Asthof

CV

Solo Exhibitions

2017
shoot the freak, Kunstverein Ruhr, Essen
gift, Gesellschaft für Aktulle Kunst, Bremen

2016
hell, Galerie K', Bremen
liquid, light, KWS, Einbeck

2014
Das Vergnügen, Galerie K', Bremen

2013
hidden, Galerie Anita Beckers, Frankfurt am Main
20 Blicke, Schloss Leuk / Schweiz

2012
L-Train, Künstlerhaus Göttingen

2009
gleam, kunsthalle bremerhaven, (katalog)

2008
blink, Elektrohaus Hamburg

2004
Eintauchen, Gerhard-Marcks-Haus, Bremen

Group Exhibitions

2019

Geheimnis der Dinge - Malstücke, Kunsthalle Recklinghausen

Bildersprachen, Syker Vorwerk

2018
Das Geheimnis der Dinge, Beck & Eggeling, Düsseldorf
Die Gegenwart der Kunst, Künstlerhaus Göttingen
Exzess, Galerie K', Bremen
Ein Turm von Unmöglichkeiten, Salon Hansa, Glockenturm der Galerie König, Berlin

2017
Künstlerräume, Weserburg, Bremen
Trading Illusions, Nationalmuseum Kiew
Moonshot, Galerie Jahn, München

2015
im interim, Galerie K', Bremen
Grosser Hans-Purrmann-Preis, Kunstverein Speyer

2014
Ruinen der Gegenwart, Steinbrenner / Dempf & Huber, Wien
Karin Kneffel und Meisterschüler, Galerie Eichenmüllerhaus, Lemgo
knolling, Galerie für Gegenwartskunst, Bremen
Transition, Ausstellungshalle Frankfurt am Main
Japonism in Contemporary Art, Nippon Gallery, New York

2013
Peanuts of Joy, Kunstraum Dreieich
899 km, Galerie im Traklhaus, Salzburg

2012
the von show, von, New York
déjà-vu?, Staatliche Kunsthalle Karlsruhe
Karl-Schmidt-Rottluff Preisträgerausstellung, Kunsthalle Düsseldorf

2010
Leinen los!, Kunstverein Hannover

2009
Die unsichtbare Hand - Zeitgenössische Zeichnung, Städtische Galerie Delmenhorst

2008
Malerei 2008, Westfälischer Kunstverein, Münster